Salute my classmates and welcome again in my blog.
This is the last post and I am feeling a bit nostalgic about this right now. I want to say that I have enjoyed all your reflections and I have learned a lot from this website and from you also. For sure I will be using blog again to be in touch with you.
Today I am going to write about assesment and how it changes when we include a new component.Without going into assessing the educational framework modified by the introduction of technology, three major changes that technology has brought to the context of the evaluation. With the risk of inaccuracy in the classification of the facts, we identify each contribution by means of a label that looks for characterize the type of contribution made by technology.
In short, it is of:
1. Automatic evaluation, in the sense that the technology contains banks of data that are related to each other and can be offered to students immediate responses and corrections. The electronic tests type test that include correct answers exemplify this type of contribution.
2. The second contribution of technology in the evaluative field is identified through a
evaluation of a more encyclopedic type, referring to the accumulation of contents that
they are handled from a more complex source or from different sources. In this case the
The clearest example refers to the preparation of monographic works of
essay on a specific topic and for which the Internet is used as a
exceptional and very complete repository of information.
3. And the third, notable contribution refers to collaborative evaluation. In this field, the
technologies come to assist us in relation to the visualization of processes
collaborators involved in an evaluation of these characteristics. this
contribution has different illustrations such as virtual debates, discussion forums,
conversation and work groups.
- If the complete evaluation process and the technical components that are at stake are reviewed in detail, we see that evaluation is more than the instruments for collecting evaluation evidence. It seems that we have been interested in confusing the evaluation with the instruments by which the evaluable data is collected and also confusing it with the qualification that such learning deserves. These two facts are reproduced over and over again, conforming to two of the biggest myths we have in the field of evaluation, the preponderance of the instruments and the tendency towards supporting evaluation. As can be seen, the instruments respond to the objective of collecting the information, but there are many other challenges for which the evaluation must be approached from a complex perspective, not only from the mere data collection phase.
- Therefore, we will need many other factors that we will not develop here, such as: the evaluation criteria that indicate the goodness of the evaluation, the act of issuing value judgments, the objectives and referents of evaluation, the conformation of educational decisions of conceptual and procedural improvement understandable and fair for teachers and students, among others. All these factors are by no means trivial and require a very well planned configuration to achieve substantial changes in evaluation practices.
- Finally, it is evaluated to communicate results of a different nature, qualitative and quantitative, and all this contributes to situate the student in the general norm of achieving specific knowledge and to progressively improve their achievements. Thus it is pointed out that the communication of results serves to qualify and exercise the most normative function of evaluation but also to develop the most psycho-pedagogical one, giving a nuclear importance to educational aids and feedback in a virtual context.
Thank you for reading my blog and for all your comments.